A) An interpretation of a first-order logic formula by assigning concrete values to variables. B) An interpretation based on mathematical induction. C) An interpretation that relies on axiomatic systems. D) An interpretation used in software engineering.
A) To transform a proof into a canonical form for easier analysis. B) To standardize the notation used in mathematical proofs. C) To eliminate the need for formal proofs. D) To add complexity to a proof in order to make it more convincing.
A) The study of the resources required to prove mathematical theorems. B) Counting the number of logical connectives in a formula. C) Measuring the length of a mathematical proof. D) Determining the truth value of a proposition.
A) The principle that cuts cannot be used in formal logic. B) The rule that cuts are necessary for valid proofs. C) Every proof containing a cut can be transformed into a cut-free proof. D) The property that all proofs must eliminate cuts.
A) A historical event in proof theory. B) A rule for constructing mathematical proofs. C) A correspondence between proofs and computer programs in intuitionistic logic. D) A type of logical inference.
A) FOR, WHILE, DO. B) IF, THEN, ELSE. C) ADD, SUBTRACT, MULTIPLY. D) AND, OR, NOT.
A) Gerhard Gentzen. B) Henri Poincaré. C) Alonzo Church. D) Alfred Tarski.
A) The theorems establish standard axiomatic systems. B) The theorems show the limitations of formal proof systems. C) The theorems provide new techniques for proof construction. D) The theorems eliminate the need for proof complexity. |