A) A) To summarize the article B) C) To write a personal opinion about the article C) B) To evaluate and analyze the article's strengths and weaknesses D) D) To translate the article into simpler language E) B) To evaluate and analyze the article's strengths and weaknesses
A) C) Rewriting the article B) C) Rewriting the article C) B) Analyzing the author's argument D) D) Discussing the article's relevance to the field E) A) Summarizing the article
A) B) The structure and organization of the article B) C) The number of references C) D) The author’s credentials D) A) The length of the article E) B) The structure and organization of the article
A) C) Are the sources cited in the article credible and relevant? B) C) Are the sources cited in the article credible and relevant? C) D) How long is the article? D) A) Is the author famous? E) B) Does the article include personal anecdotes?
A) C) Excessive use of charts and graphs B) B) Lack of peer review C) D) Ambiguous conclusion D) B) Lack of peer review E) A) Clear introduction
A) D) The article is overly complex B) B) The main argument is easy to identify and follow C) A) The article lacks structure D) B) The main argument is easy to identify and follow E) C) The introduction is lengthy
A) B) A critique is shorter than a summary B) A) A critique evaluates the article; a summary simply retells it C) D) A critique only includes the author's opinion D) A) A critique evaluates the article; a summary simply retells it E) C) A critique doesn’t discuss strengths
A) B) Discussing whether the writing is engaging and clear B) D) All of the above C) A) Identifying spelling and grammar errors D) C) Noting whether the article is too long E) D) All of the above
A) A) Whether the conclusion answers the research questions B) D) The number of sources in the conclusion C) B) If the conclusion agrees with the introduction D) A) Whether the conclusion answers the research questions E) C) The length of the conclusion
A) C) They should be addressed to show weaknesses or alternative perspectives B) C) They should be addressed to show weaknesses or alternative perspectives C) A) They should always be ignored D) B) They help strengthen the article’s main argument E) D) They are irrelevant and unnecessary in a critique |