A) Act No. 3815 B) R.A. 3815 C) P.D. 3815 D) C.A. 3815
A) Acts B) Presidential Decrees C) Republic Acts D) The Revised Penal Code
A) Com. Act No. B) P.D. No. C) Act No. D) R.A. No.
A) P.D. No. B) Law No. C) Act No. D) R.A. No.
A) Power of eminent domain B) State power C) Power of expropriation D) Police power
A) Batas Blg. B) R.A. No. C) Act No. D) P.D. No.
A) Jan. 1, 1932 B) Jan. 1, 1930 C) Jan. 1, 1933 D) Jan. 1, 1931
A) P.D. No. B) R.A. No.
A) Power of taxation B) None of these
A) True, court decisions are merley interpretations of the law. B) False, jurisprudence forms part of the law of the land.
A) Due process is a requirement that legal matters be resolved according to established rules and principles and that individuals be treated fairly. B) It means that the law be just. C) It means that laws be lenient. D) None of these.
A) Tradition theory B) Classical theory C) Empirical theory D) Positivist theory
A) None of these. B) A fixed stay. C) An occasional stay D) A temporary stay
A) Cover up for a crime. B) Add cruelty to the commission of the crime. C) Make (a problem, injury, or offense) worse or more serious. D) None of these.
A) Due process B) Equal protection C) General application of laws D) Bill of attainder
A) Territorial B) Juristic C) Traditional D) Jurisdctional
A) Punishment commensurate to measure of damages. B) Punishment to spite someone. C) Punishment inflicted on someone as vengeance for a wrong or criminal act. D) Punishment for someone being hated.
A) Consuls B) Envoys C) Consultants D) Ambassadors
A) Classical theory B) Traditional theory C) Positivist theory D) Empirical theory
A) None of these. B) Recall or withdraw a law or congressional act. C) Revoke or annul (a law or congressional act). D) Expand the law or congressional act.
A) British rule B) American rule C) French rule D) English rule
A) Clumsiness B) Negligence C) Felony D) Imprudence
A) When offender commits a crime against national security or the law of nations even if outside the Philippines. B) When the offender commits a crime against public interest even if outside the Philippines. C) When the offender commits a crime against persons even if outside the Philippines. D) When the offender commits a crime against public order even if outside the Philippines.
A) No, because X and his companions fired at the person even without danger on their part as A was jsut lying on the hammock. B) All of these are correct. C) No, because X and his companions did not first ascertain the identity of their target. D) No, because X and his companions were negligent.
A) British rule B) English rule C) American rule D) Frech rule
A) Mala prohibita B) Probable felonies C) Mala in se D) Culpable felonies
A) Yes, because the crime was committed outside the Philippines. B) Yes, because any crime committed outsid ethe Philippines is beyond our courts' jurisdiction. C) No, because crimes committed in Philippine ship or airship is within the jurisdiction of our courts even if the ship is outside the country. D) Yes, because criminal law is territorial.
A) European rule B) American rule C) English rule D) British rule
A) English rule B) French rule
A) Regional Trial Court in which the charge was first filed B) Municipal trial courts
A) Lack of intelligence B) Lack of freedom C) Lack of criminal intent D) Mistake of fact
A) By the criminal tendency of a person. B) By the overt acts of a person. C) By the prior acts of a person. D) By the criminal mind of the person.
A) No, X is not correct and he is liable because he was negligent. B) Yes, X is correct because a person is laible only if he has criminal mind. C) No, X is not correct because injuries resulted. D) No, X is not correct because the toddler is a minor and if injured by someone, there will always be criminal liability.
A) Mala in se B) Special crime C) Mala prohibita D) Heinous crime
A) Not criminally liable. B) No moral liability.
A) All of these. B) Acts and omissions punishable by the Revised Penal Code
A) A man is defined by his vert acts. B) The act itself does not make a man guilty unless his intentions were so. C) The act of a man defines him. D) The criminal mind of a man is shown by his overt acts.
A) Excess of force B) Praeter intentionem C) None of these. D) Violent strike
A) Negligence B) Imprudence C) Lack of foresight. D) Clumsiness
A) Mens rea B) Intent
A) True B) True in all cases.
A) Yes, this statement is true because intent is an essential issue in mala in se crimes while mere commission or omission of the prohibited or required act is sufficient in mala prohibita. B) All of these are correct.
A) Such defense will exonerate X. B) Such defense is illegal. C) None of these. D) Such defense will not exonerate X.
A) Homicide because the supposed shooting of A was without aggravating circumstances. B) Parricide because the victim was his own father. C) Murder because the intended victim was A. D) None of these.
A) Imprudence B) Omission C) Culpa D) Negligence
A) Proximate cause B) Mens rea C) Intent D) Motive
A) Motive B) Intent C) Bias D) Prejudice
A) None of these. B) Mistake in the aim C) Mistake in the blow D) Mistake victim
A) Legislative B) Political C) Executive D) Judicial
A) Intent B) All of these. C) Intelligence D) Freedom
A) Omission B) Act C) Fraud D) Intent |