A) An interpretation used in software engineering. B) An interpretation based on mathematical induction. C) An interpretation that relies on axiomatic systems. D) An interpretation of a first-order logic formula by assigning concrete values to variables.
A) To standardize the notation used in mathematical proofs. B) To transform a proof into a canonical form for easier analysis. C) To add complexity to a proof in order to make it more convincing. D) To eliminate the need for formal proofs.
A) The study of the resources required to prove mathematical theorems. B) Counting the number of logical connectives in a formula. C) Determining the truth value of a proposition. D) Measuring the length of a mathematical proof.
A) The rule that cuts are necessary for valid proofs. B) The principle that cuts cannot be used in formal logic. C) Every proof containing a cut can be transformed into a cut-free proof. D) The property that all proofs must eliminate cuts.
A) A type of logical inference. B) A rule for constructing mathematical proofs. C) A historical event in proof theory. D) A correspondence between proofs and computer programs in intuitionistic logic.
A) IF, THEN, ELSE. B) FOR, WHILE, DO. C) AND, OR, NOT. D) ADD, SUBTRACT, MULTIPLY.
A) Henri Poincaré. B) Gerhard Gentzen. C) Alonzo Church. D) Alfred Tarski.
A) The theorems show the limitations of formal proof systems. B) The theorems establish standard axiomatic systems. C) The theorems provide new techniques for proof construction. D) The theorems eliminate the need for proof complexity. |